Somewhat Resilient

Last Update: 8/30/2026

AI Resilience Score for Biologists:

45.8%

Median Score

Meaningful human contribution

Med

Long-term employer demand

Med

Sustained economic opportunity

Med

Our confidence in this score:
Medium

Contributing sources

Methodology and Scoring Rationale

To score how resilient biology work is to AI, we ask one question in three parts:

First, how much of the job still needs a human, read from five AI-exposure sources: our own AI Resilience Model, Anthropic's Observed Exposure, Microsoft's AI Applicability, Will Robots Take My Job, and OpenAI Signals. We call this dimension Meaningful Human Contribution (MHC) and weight it at 40%.

Next, whether employers will keep hiring for this job over the long term. This dimension, which we call Long-term Employer Demand (LTE), is calculated from BLS data and weighted at 30%.

Last, whether pay and mobility will hold up. We use wage bill and adaptive capacity data from independent researchers (Althoff & Reichardt, 2026; Manning & Aguirre, 2026). We call this dimension Sustained Economic Opportunity (SEO) and weight it at 30%.

For biologists, six of eight sources had data, with two sources missing entirely. Exposure was split: AI Resilience Model and Anthropic saw AI handling more of the work, while Will Robots Take My Job pointed the other way, and OpenAI Signals landed in the middle. That disagreement kept confidence at medium. Middling demand and pay held the score at "Somewhat Resilient."

AI Resilience Report forBiologists

$98,920 median salary4,300 annual openingsSOC Code: 19-1029.04

Biologists are somewhat less resilient to AI impacts than most occupations, according to our analysis of 6 sources.

Biology is "Somewhat Resilient" because AI is genuinely changing how a lot of the work gets done, especially the data-heavy tasks like analyzing large datasets, modeling protein structures, and tracking wildlife patterns. Those parts of the job are being handed off to AI tools more and more, which means biologists who don't adapt their skills could find themselves left behind.

Learn more about how you can thrive in this position

View analysis
Chat with Coach
Latest news
More career info
Analysis
Chat
News
More

This role is somewhat resilient

Biology is "Somewhat Resilient" because AI is genuinely changing how a lot of the work gets done, especially the data-heavy tasks like analyzing large datasets, modeling protein structures, and tracking wildlife patterns. Those parts of the job are being handed off to AI tools more and more, which means biologists who don't adapt their skills could find themselves left behind.

Read full analysis

Learn more about how you can thrive in this position

View analysis
Chat with Coach
Latest news
More career info
Analysis
Chat
News
More

Analysis of Current AI Resilience

Biologists

Updated Quarterly

Analysis
Suggested Actions
State of Automation

How is AI changing Biologists jobs?

Right now, AI is mostly augmenting biologists rather than replacing them — meaning it's a powerful assistant, not a substitute. The data-heavy parts of the job (like coding, running analyses, and searching huge datasets) are where AI shines. Artificial intelligence is increasingly becoming part of the ecological toolkit, helping researchers analyze large environmental datasets, uncover patterns in complex systems and develop new approaches to environmental research, and at the Ecological Society of America's 2026 Annual Meeting [1], featured talks cover automated wildlife monitoring and biodiversity observation networks to forecasting invasive species spread, assessing disease risk and improving food security monitoring.

In molecular biology, tools like AlphaFold — the AI that won the 2024 Nobel Prize in Chemistry [2] — now let scientists model protein structures they used to spend years puzzling out. McKinsey researchers note [3] that AI now has the potential to transform not just how drugs and devices are brought to market, but how the entire enterprise operates. Still, full replacement isn't close: a recent Nature news story reports [4] that computers are not yet ready to replace their makers when it comes to designing and running real research.

Reveal More
AI Adoption

How fast is AI adoption growing for Biologists?

Adoption is moving fast in biology — but unevenly. McKinsey describes [3] an adoption rate that is faster than anything we've ever seen, driven by huge economic payoffs in drug discovery, ecology, and diagnostics. Hiring data backs this up: CompBioJobs' Q2 2026 report [5] tracked 631 bioinformatics openings with average salaries climbing 9% in one quarter, and an AI-first startup posting up to $570K.

What slows adoption is that biology deals with living systems where mistakes matter — experiments still need physical validation, ethical review, and human judgment. That's why teaching, mentoring, conference work, and supervising other scientists (all rated under 5% automation risk) remain firmly human. The takeaway for students: learning coding, statistics, and how to work with AI tools is now as important as knowing how to pipette.

Reveal More
Will AI replace Biologists?

Will AI replace Biologists?

Not entirely. We think AI will take over some tasks, but not the whole job.

Biology sits at a 45.8% AI Resilience Score, which tells you this field is genuinely changing. AI is already handling the data-heavy work: analyzing large environmental datasets, modeling protein structures, and accelerating drug discovery. Tools like AlphaFold have reshaped what's possible in molecular biology [2], and McKinsey describes an adoption rate faster than anything we've ever seen in life sciences [3]. That's real disruption, and students should take it seriously.

But biology is still grounded in living systems where mistakes have real consequences. Experiments need physical validation, ethical oversight, and human judgment. Nature reports that computers are not yet ready to replace their makers when it comes to designing and running real research [4]. Teaching, mentoring, and supervising other scientists remain firmly human work. Those aren't small corners of the job.

The economic picture is mixed but not bleak. Bioinformatics hiring is active, with salaries climbing and AI-fluent candidates in demand [5]. The clearest path forward for students is learning to work with AI tools, not just around them. Coding, statistics, and data literacy are now as essential as any lab skill.

Reveal More
Career Village Logo

Help us improve this report.

Tell us if this analysis feels accurate or we missed something.

Share your feedback

Your Career Starts Here

Navigate your career with COACH, your free AI Career Coach. Research-backed, designed with career experts.

Explore careers

Plan your next steps

Get resume help

Find jobs

Explore careers

Plan your next steps

Get resume help

Find jobs

Explore careers

Plan your next steps

Get resume help

Find jobs

Career Village Logo

Ask a pro on CareerVillage.org. Free career advice from more than 200,000 professionals.

Latest AI news for Biologists

These articles highlight the transformative impact of AI on biology careers, emphasizing how technology can enhance research and conservation efforts. For instance, the discovery of a natural molecule similar to Ozempic showcases AI's role in innovative drug development, while Swiss AI aids in wildlife conservation by identifying species across diverse habitats. As biologists adopt AI tools, they can unlock new opportunities, making the field more dynamic and accessible. Embracing AI advancements fosters resilience, preparing future biologists for a rapidly evolving landscape.

More Career Info

Career: Biologists

They study living things, like plants and animals, to understand how they work, grow, and interact with their environment.

Employment & Wage Data

Median Wage

$98,920

Jobs (2025)

59,600

Growth (2025-35)

+4.7%

Annual Openings

4,300

Education

Bachelor's degree

Experience

None

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Employment Projections 2025-2035

Task-Level AI Resilience Scores

AI-generated estimates of task resilience over the next 3 years

1

96% ResilienceCore Task

Represent employer in a technical capacity at conferences.

2

96% ResilienceCore Task

Supervise biological technicians and technologists and other scientists.

3

95% ResilienceCore Task

Develop and maintain liaisons and effective working relations with groups and individuals, agencies, and the public to encourage cooperative management strategies or to develop information and interpr...

4

95% ResilienceCore Task

Teach or supervise students and perform research at universities and colleges.

5

92% ResilienceSupplemental

Plan and administer biological research programs for government, research firms, medical industries, or manufacturing firms.

6

90% ResilienceSupplemental

Develop methods and apparatus for securing representative plant, animal, aquatic, or soil samples.

7

88% ResilienceSupplemental

Study and manage wild animal populations.

Tasks are ranked by their AI resilience, with the most resilient tasks shown first. Core tasks are essential functions of this occupation, while supplemental tasks provide additional context.

The AI Resilience Report is a project from CareerVillage.org®, a registered 501(c)(3) nonprofit.

Built with ❤️ by Sandbox Web

The AI Resilience Report is governed by CareerVillage.org’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. This site is not affiliated with Anthropic, Microsoft, or any other data provider and doesn't necessarily represent their viewpoints. This site is being actively updated, and may sometimes contain errors or require improvement in wording or data. To report an error or request a change, please contact air@careervillage.org.