Somewhat Resilient

Last Update: 6/19/2026

AI Resilience Score for Engineering Teachers:

46.6%

Median Score

Meaningful human contribution

Med

Long-term employer demand

Med

Sustained economic opportunity

Med

Our confidence in this score:
High

Contributing sources

Methodology and Scoring Rationale

To score how resilient postsecondary engineering teaching is to AI, we ask one question in three parts:

First, how much of the job still needs a human, read from four AI-exposure sources: our own AI Resilience Model, Anthropic's Observed Exposure, Microsoft's AI Applicability, and Will Robots Take My Job. We call this dimension Meaningful Human Contribution (MHC) and weight it at 40%.

Next, whether employers will keep hiring for this job over the long term. This dimension, which we call Long-term Employer Demand (LTE), is calculated from BLS data and weighted at 30%.

Last, whether pay and mobility will hold up. We use wage bill and adaptive capacity data from independent researchers (Althoff & Reichardt, 2026; Manning & Aguirre, 2026). We call this dimension Sustained Economic Opportunity (SEO) and weight it at 30%.

For engineering teachers, all seven sources had data, giving us high confidence in the score. AI exposure split somewhat: Anthropic and Microsoft rated it high, while Will Robots Take My Job rated it low and our model landed in the middle. Demand and economic signals both came in medium, keeping the label at "Somewhat Resilient."

AI Resilience Report forEngineering Teachers, Postsecondary

$106,120 median salary4,100 annual openingsSOC Code: 25-1032.00

Engineering Teachers, Postsecondary are somewhat less resilient to AI impacts than most occupations, according to our analysis of 7 sources.

Engineering professors are "Somewhat Resilient" because AI is already handling a real chunk of their behind-the-scenes work, like drafting grant proposals, writing test questions, and answering routine student questions, which means the job is genuinely changing even if it is not disappearing. The parts of the role that AI cannot easily touch, including mentoring students through tough moments, leading hands-on labs, and sparking real discussions about engineering ethics and problem-solving, are still very human and very hard to automate.

Learn more about how you can thrive in this position

View analysis
Chat with Coach
Latest news
More career info
Analysis
Chat
News
More

This role is somewhat resilient

Engineering professors are "Somewhat Resilient" because AI is already handling a real chunk of their behind-the-scenes work, like drafting grant proposals, writing test questions, and answering routine student questions, which means the job is genuinely changing even if it is not disappearing. The parts of the role that AI cannot easily touch, including mentoring students through tough moments, leading hands-on labs, and sparking real discussions about engineering ethics and problem-solving, are still very human and very hard to automate.

Read full analysis

Learn more about how you can thrive in this position

View analysis
Chat with Coach
Latest news
More career info
Analysis
Chat
News
More

Analysis of Current AI Resilience

Engineering Teachers

Updated Quarterly

Analysis
Suggested Actions
State of Automation

How is AI changing Engineering Teachers jobs?

Right now, AI is mostly augmenting engineering professors rather than replacing them. The work happening behind the scenes — drafting tests, writing grant applications, answering routine student questions — is where AI tools are showing up first. For example, a new study covered in Nature found that NIH grant proposals drafted or edited with AI chatbots were more likely to win funding [1], though they also tended to look more similar to past winners.

On the teaching side, ASEE researchers published in March 2026 are testing custom AI chatbots that answer undergraduate engineering students' questions outside class hours [2], letting professors focus on harder concepts and mentoring. Big systems are also moving fast: the California State University system spent $17 million giving all 460,000 students, faculty, and staff access to ChatGPT Edu [3]. But the high-touch parts of the job — supervising research, leading discussions, and mentoring — are still very human.

As one professor told NPR, AI-written essays are like "bringing a forklift to the gym" — the work gets done, but the learning muscles never develop [4].

Reveal More
AI Adoption

How fast is AI adoption growing for Engineering Teachers?

Adoption is moving quickly in some areas and slowly in others. On the "fast" side, Deloitte's 2026 Higher Education Trends report notes universities are betting on AI tools to handle grant reporting so researchers can spend more time on actual research [5], and budget pressure is pushing schools toward automation. On the "slow" side, faculty are pushing back hard on ethical grounds — thousands of CSU faculty signed a petition asking the chancellor not to renew the OpenAI contract and instead "use the savings to protect jobs" [3].

Accreditation rules, academic freedom, and worries about student learning are real brakes on full automation. The good news for anyone thinking about this career: the skills that AI can't easily copy — mentoring young engineers, designing meaningful labs, and leading honest classroom discussions — are exactly the skills Deloitte highlights as the "human" capabilities (communication, teamwork, and critical thinking) that will be more valued, not less, as AI spreads [5].

Reveal More
Will AI replace Engineering Teachers?

Will AI replace Engineering Teachers?

Not entirely. We think AI will take over some tasks, but not the whole job.

Engineering professors already have AI showing up in their workflows, and the pace is picking up. Universities are deploying AI chatbots to handle routine student questions outside class hours [2], and tools are being used to streamline grant writing and reporting so researchers can focus on actual research [5]. With systems like California State University spending $17 million to give hundreds of thousands of students and faculty access to AI tools [3], the administrative and repetitive parts of this job are clearly in AI's crosshairs.

But a 46.6% AI Resilience Score tells a more complicated story than "replaced." The work that defines a great engineering professor, supervising research, designing hands-on labs, mentoring students through hard problems, and leading honest classroom discussions, is still deeply human. As one professor put it, AI-written work is like "bringing a forklift to the gym": the task gets done, but the learning never happens [4]. Accreditation standards and faculty pushback are also real brakes on full automation.

We believe the role will change more than it will disappear. Professors who lean into AI for the routine stuff and double down on mentoring and critical thinking will be in the strongest position.

Reveal More
Career Village Logo

Help us improve this report.

Tell us if this analysis feels accurate or we missed something.

Share your feedback

Your Career Starts Here

Navigate your career with COACH, your free AI Career Coach. Research-backed, designed with career experts.

Explore careers

Plan your next steps

Get resume help

Find jobs

Explore careers

Plan your next steps

Get resume help

Find jobs

Explore careers

Plan your next steps

Get resume help

Find jobs

Career Village Logo

Ask a pro on CareerVillage.org. Free career advice from more than 200,000 professionals.

Latest AI news for Engineering Teachers

These articles highlight the evolving role of AI in engineering education, emphasizing the need for postsecondary engineering teachers to adapt their teaching methods. For example, the article on AI-based educational tools demonstrates how such tools can enhance scientific writing skills, crucial for engineering students. Additionally, the piece on transforming computer science education illustrates the importance of collaboration among educators to integrate AI effectively. By embracing these advancements, future engineering teachers can foster resilience in their careers, ensuring they remain relevant and impactful in an AI-driven landscape.

More Career Info

Career: Engineering Teachers, Postsecondary

They teach college students about engineering, helping them understand concepts and solve problems to prepare for engineering careers.

Employment & Wage Data

Median Wage

$106,120

Jobs (2024)

50,300

Growth (2024-34)

+8.1%

Annual Openings

4,100

Education

Doctoral or professional degree

Experience

None

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Employment Projections 2024-2034

Task-Level AI Resilience Scores

AI-generated estimates of task resilience over the next 3 years

1

96% ResilienceSupplemental

Provide professional consulting services to government or industry.

2

95% ResilienceSupplemental

Perform administrative duties such as serving as department head.

3

95% ResilienceSupplemental

Participate in campus and community events.

4

94% ResilienceCore Task

Initiate, facilitate, and moderate class discussions.

5

93% ResilienceSupplemental

Compile bibliographies of specialized materials for outside reading assignments.

6

92% ResilienceCore Task

Supervise undergraduate or graduate teaching, internship, and research work.

7

92% ResilienceCore Task

Select and obtain materials and supplies such as textbooks and laboratory equipment.

Tasks are ranked by their AI resilience, with the most resilient tasks shown first. Core tasks are essential functions of this occupation, while supplemental tasks provide additional context.

The AI Resilience Report is a project from CareerVillage.org®, a registered 501(c)(3) nonprofit.

Built with ❤️ by Sandbox Web

The AI Resilience Report is governed by CareerVillage.org’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. This site is not affiliated with Anthropic, Microsoft, or any other data provider and doesn't necessarily represent their viewpoints. This site is being actively updated, and may sometimes contain errors or require improvement in wording or data. To report an error or request a change, please contact air@careervillage.org.