Somewhat Resilient

Last Update: 6/19/2026

AI Resilience Score for Judicial Law Clerks:

40.9%

Median Score

Meaningful human contribution

Med

Long-term employer demand

Low

Sustained economic opportunity

Med

Our confidence in this score:
Medium

Contributing sources

Methodology and Scoring Rationale

To score how resilient judicial law clerk work is to AI, we ask one question in three parts:

First, how much of the job still needs a human, read from four AI-exposure sources: our own AI Resilience Model, Anthropic's Observed Exposure, Microsoft's AI Applicability, and Will Robots Take My Job. We call this dimension Meaningful Human Contribution (MHC) and weight it at 40%.

Next, whether employers will keep hiring for this job over the long term. This dimension, which we call Long-term Employer Demand (LTE), is calculated from BLS data and weighted at 30%.

Last, whether pay and mobility will hold up. We use wage bill and adaptive capacity data from independent researchers (Althoff & Reichardt, 2026; Manning & Aguirre, 2026). We call this dimension Sustained Economic Opportunity (SEO) and weight it at 30%.

For judicial law clerks, six of seven sources had data, with Adaptive Capacity missing. Sources mostly agreed on medium AI exposure, though Microsoft rated it lower, keeping confidence at medium. Demand projections from the BLS Opportunity Score came in low, which weighed heavily on the final result, leaving this role "Somewhat Resilient."

AI Resilience Report forJudicial Law Clerks

$60,400 median salary1,000 annual openingsSOC Code: 23-1012.00

Judicial Law Clerks are somewhat less resilient to AI impacts than most occupations, according to our analysis of 6 sources.

Judicial law clerks land in the "Somewhat Resilient" category because AI is already handling a big chunk of their routine work, like pulling case precedents, summarizing transcripts, and tracking dockets, which means the role is genuinely changing. The good news is that courts are moving carefully, and the most important parts of the job (exercising careful legal judgment, catching AI errors, and advising judges on complex ethical questions) still require a sharp human mind.

Learn more about how you can thrive in this position

View analysis
Chat with Coach
Latest news
More career info
Analysis
Chat
News
More

This role is somewhat resilient

Judicial law clerks land in the "Somewhat Resilient" category because AI is already handling a big chunk of their routine work, like pulling case precedents, summarizing transcripts, and tracking dockets, which means the role is genuinely changing. The good news is that courts are moving carefully, and the most important parts of the job (exercising careful legal judgment, catching AI errors, and advising judges on complex ethical questions) still require a sharp human mind.

Read full analysis

Learn more about how you can thrive in this position

View analysis
Chat with Coach
Latest news
More career info
Analysis
Chat
News
More

Analysis of Current AI Resilience

Judicial Law Clerks

Updated Quarterly

Analysis
Suggested Actions
State of Automation

How is AI changing Judicial Law Clerks jobs?

Right now, AI in courts is mostly augmenting law clerks rather than replacing them — and judges are pretty open about it. Louisiana appellate Judge Scott Schlegel says he and other judges use AI for legal research, to search extensive case records, and to summarize testimony, and he cautions colleagues to "treat AI like a first-year law clerk and double-check everything". U.S. Magistrate Judge Allison Goddard and her law clerks have experimented with ChatGPT, Claude, vLex's Vincent, and Thomson Reuters' CoCounsel [1] to draft motions, build timelines, and summarize transcripts.

The National Judicial College is even training appellate judges on exactly this, with live demonstrations of how AI tools may be used for initial case assessment, legal research, brief writing and opinion drafting [2]. So the most automatable tasks — checking files, pulling precedents, tracking dockets — are increasingly handled with AI, while clerks focus on judgment-heavy work.

Reveal More
AI Adoption

How fast is AI adoption growing for Judicial Law Clerks?

Adoption is moving fast in the broader legal world. A Litify 2025 report found AI use among legal professionals reached 78%, with case and legal research being the #1 use [3]. But courts move more cautiously.

A Brookings TechTank discussion on AI in legal practice [4] highlights ethics and accuracy concerns, and the stakes are higher for judges — as the ABA notes, federal judges in Mississippi and New Jersey withdrew rulings after AI-related errors, and a Georgia appellate court overturned a divorce decree because the trial judge's order relied on fake caselaw [1] [5]. A National Law Review survey of 85 legal experts found 58.3% reject the idea that AI will replace entry-level lawyers within five years [6], suggesting clerkships will evolve, not vanish. The hopeful takeaway: if you're considering this path, your human strengths — careful judgment, ethical reasoning, and face-to-face communication with judges and attorneys — are exactly what AI can't replicate, and they'll matter more, not less.

Reveal More
Will AI replace Judicial Law Clerks?

Will AI replace Judicial Law Clerks?

Not entirely. We think AI will take over some tasks, but not the whole job.

Judicial law clerks earn a 40.9% AI Resilience Score from us, which means this role faces real change. The most routine work, pulling precedents, checking dockets, summarizing transcripts, is already shifting toward AI tools. Judges and clerks are actively experimenting with platforms like ChatGPT and CoCounsel to draft motions and build timelines [1], and the National Judicial College is training appellate judges on using AI for research and opinion drafting [2].

But courts move cautiously for good reason. Federal judges have withdrawn rulings and a Georgia appellate court overturned a divorce decree after AI-generated errors slipped through (abajournal.com, americanbar.org). That kind of accountability keeps humans firmly in the loop. A survey of 85 legal experts found 58.3% reject the idea that AI will replace entry-level lawyers within five years [6], and clerkships sit in that same protected space.

The honest picture is that demand for this role is not strong through 2034, so competition will stay tight. Still, the skills that make a great law clerk, careful judgment, ethical reasoning, and direct communication with judges, are exactly what AI cannot replicate. If you build those strengths, you will find a place in this field.

Reveal More
Career Village Logo

Help us improve this report.

Tell us if this analysis feels accurate or we missed something.

Share your feedback

Your Career Starts Here

Navigate your career with COACH, your free AI Career Coach. Research-backed, designed with career experts.

Explore careers

Plan your next steps

Get resume help

Find jobs

Explore careers

Plan your next steps

Get resume help

Find jobs

Explore careers

Plan your next steps

Get resume help

Find jobs

Career Village Logo

Ask a pro on CareerVillage.org. Free career advice from more than 200,000 professionals.

Latest AI news for Judicial Law Clerks

These articles highlight the evolving role of AI in the judicial system, emphasizing the need for Judicial Law Clerks to adapt and innovate. For instance, California courts are piloting AI tools that draft legal orders, suggesting that clerks will need to work alongside technology to enhance efficiency. Additionally, the Supreme Court of India’s response to AI-generated fake orders underscores the importance of ethical standards and accountability. Embracing AI resilience will be key for future clerks, enabling them to leverage technology while maintaining the integrity of the legal process.

More Career Info

Career: Judicial Law Clerks

They assist judges by researching legal issues, preparing briefs, and helping with courtroom procedures to ensure the court runs smoothly and fairly.

Similar Careers

Employment & Wage Data

Median Wage

$60,400

Jobs (2024)

14,500

Growth (2024-34)

+2.5%

Annual Openings

1,000

Education

Doctoral or professional degree

Experience

None

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Employment Projections 2024-2034

Task-Level AI Resilience Scores

AI-generated estimates of task resilience over the next 3 years

1

94% ResilienceCore Task

Confer with judges concerning legal questions, construction of documents, or granting of orders.

2

92% ResilienceCore Task

Attend court sessions to hear oral arguments or record necessary case information.

3

92% ResilienceSupplemental

Perform courtroom duties, including calling calendars, administering oaths, and swearing in jury panels and witnesses.

4

90% ResilienceSupplemental

Participate in conferences or discussions between trial attorneys and judges.

5

88% ResilienceCore Task

Respond to questions from judicial officers or court staff on general legal issues.

6

85% ResilienceSupplemental

Supervise law students, volunteers, or other personnel assigned to the court.

7

82% ResilienceSupplemental

Communicate with counsel regarding case management or procedural requirements.

Tasks are ranked by their AI resilience, with the most resilient tasks shown first. Core tasks are essential functions of this occupation, while supplemental tasks provide additional context.

The AI Resilience Report is a project from CareerVillage.org®, a registered 501(c)(3) nonprofit.

Built with ❤️ by Sandbox Web

The AI Resilience Report is governed by CareerVillage.org’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. This site is not affiliated with Anthropic, Microsoft, or any other data provider and doesn't necessarily represent their viewpoints. This site is being actively updated, and may sometimes contain errors or require improvement in wording or data. To report an error or request a change, please contact air@careervillage.org.