Somewhat Resilient
Last Update: 8/30/2026
AI Resilience Score for Admin Law Judges/Officers:
43.4%
Median Score
Meaningful human contribution
Measures the parts of the occupation that still require a human touch. This score averages data from up to four AI exposure datasets, focusing on the role’s resilience against automation.
Med
Long-term employer demand
Predicts the health of the job market for this role through 2034. Using Bureau of Labor Statistics data, it balances projected annual job openings (60%) with overall employment growth (40%).
Low
Sustained economic opportunity
Measures future earning potential and career flexibility. This score is a blend of total projected labor income (67%) and the role’s inherent ability to adapt to economic and technological shifts (33%).
Med
This reflects the reliability of your score based on the number of data sources available for this career and how closely those sources agree on the outlook. A higher confidence means more consistent evidence from labor experts and AI models.
Most data sources align, with only minor variation. This is a well-supported result.
Contributing sources
AI Resilience Report forAdministrative Law Judges, Adjudicators, and Hearing Officers
$117,860 median salary•500 annual openings•SOC Code: 23-1021.00
Administrative Law Judges, Adjudicators, and Hearing Officers are somewhat less resilient to AI impacts than most occupations, according to our analysis of 8 sources.
This career is labeled "Somewhat Resilient" because AI is already changing some of the day-to-day work in meaningful ways, even while the most important parts of the job stay firmly in human hands. Tasks like legal research, document review, and scheduling are being automated or assisted by AI tools, which means the job is shifting rather than staying exactly the same.
Learn more about how you can thrive in this position
View analysis
Chat with Coach
Latest news
More career infoAnalysisChatNewsMoreThis role is somewhat resilient
This career is labeled "Somewhat Resilient" because AI is already changing some of the day-to-day work in meaningful ways, even while the most important parts of the job stay firmly in human hands. Tasks like legal research, document review, and scheduling are being automated or assisted by AI tools, which means the job is shifting rather than staying exactly the same.
Read full analysisLearn more about how you can thrive in this position
View analysisChat with CoachLatest newsMore career infoAnalysisChatNewsMoreAnalysis of Current AI Resilience
Admin Law Judges/Officers
Updated Quarterly
How is AI changing Admin Law Judges/Officers jobs?
Right now, AI is mostly augmenting administrative law judges rather than replacing them. In a random-sample survey of federal judges, more than 60 percent reported using at least one AI tool in their judicial work [1], though only 22.4% used AI tools weekly or daily [1]. The American Bar Association notes that judges are using AI mostly for legal research and document review [2] — the same "research laws and evaluate documents" tasks listed for this career.
On the administrative side, the Social Security Administration recently rolled out tools that automatically route good-cause statements for untimely hearing requests [3] and centralized vocational-expert scheduling to improve docket coverage [3], directly touching the highly automatable scheduling task. Courts are also piloting judge-specific tools like Learned Hand, and Thomson Reuters and LexisNexis now hold contracts to provide AI tools to the federal judiciary [4]. Importantly, judges see AI as a tool that augments and helps advance justice, not one that replaces decision-making or human judgment [5].
Sources
How fast is AI adoption growing for Admin Law Judges/Officers?
Adoption will likely be steady but cautious. On the "speed it up" side, caseloads are huge, and commercial legal-AI tools are already sold to courts. On the "slow it down" side, the stakes are high: legal scholars warn that the black-box nature of AI can make it impossible for reviewing judges to assess the reasonableness of decisions [6] under the Administrative Procedure Act, and nearly half of surveyed judges reported receiving no AI training [2].
The good news for young people curious about this career: judgment, fairness, and safeguarding people's legal rights — the lowest-automation tasks on your list — are exactly the human skills courts are protecting most fiercely.
Sources
Will AI replace Admin Law Judges/Officers?
Not entirely. We think AI will take over some tasks, but not the whole job.
Our 43.4% AI Resilience Score reflects a real tension: this role handles high-stakes decisions about people's legal rights, which courts are fiercely protecting from full automation, but plenty of the surrounding work is already being handed off to software. The Social Security Administration, for example, has already deployed tools that automatically route hearing requests and centralize scheduling [3]. Legal research and document review are going the same direction, with Thomson Reuters and LexisNexis now holding contracts to supply AI tools directly to the federal judiciary [4].
What stays human is the part that matters most: weighing evidence, applying fairness, and making judgment calls that affect real people's lives. Legal scholars warn that black-box AI decisions can make it impossible for reviewing judges to assess reasonableness under the Administrative Procedure Act [6], which is a serious legal brake on full automation. Judges themselves largely see AI as a tool that advances justice rather than one that replaces their judgment [5].
The job market picture is honestly modest, with low projected employer demand through 2034. But the core of this work, human judgment in high-stakes settings, is exactly what AI cannot credibly replace right now.
Sources
Help us improve this report.
Tell us if this analysis feels accurate or we missed something.
Share your feedback
Latest AI news for Admin Law Judges/Officers
The article on "Administrative Law Judges: AI Risk Analysis" reveals that while there is a 52/100 risk of AI impacting this career, there are ways to adapt. It discusses which tasks—like data analysis and document review—are more likely to be automated first. Understanding these trends can help aspiring judges focus on developing skills in areas that require human judgment and empathy, ensuring they remain relevant in a changing landscape. Embracing technology while honing interpersonal skills will foster AI resilience in their future careers.
More Career Info
Career: Administrative Law Judges, Adjudicators, and Hearing Officers
They make decisions on legal cases by listening to both sides, reviewing evidence, and ensuring that rules and laws are followed.
Parent Careers
Employment & Wage Data
Median Wage
$117,860
Jobs (2025)
17,400
Growth (2025-35)
+0.0%
Annual Openings
500
Education
Doctoral or professional degree
Experience
5 years or more
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Employment Projections 2025-2035
Task-Level AI Resilience Scores
AI-generated estimates of task resilience over the next 3 years
1
Conduct hearings to review and decide claims regarding issues, such as social program eligibility, environmental protection, or enforcement of health and safety regulations.
2
Monitor and direct the activities of trials and hearings to ensure that they are conducted fairly and that courts administer justice while safeguarding the legal rights of all involved parties.
3
Rule on exceptions, motions, and admissibility of evidence.
4
Determine existence and amount of liability according to current laws, administrative and judicial precedents, and available evidence.
5
Prepare written opinions and decisions.
6
Confer with individuals or organizations involved in cases to obtain relevant information.
7
Recommend the acceptance or rejection of claims or compromise settlements according to laws, regulations, policies, and precedent decisions.
Tasks are ranked by their AI resilience, with the most resilient tasks shown first. Core tasks are essential functions of this occupation, while supplemental tasks provide additional context.
