Somewhat Resilient
Last Update: 10/7/2026
AI Resilience Score for Admin Law Judges/Officers:
43.4%
Median Score
Meaningful human contribution
Measures the parts of the occupation that still require a human touch. This score averages data from up to four AI exposure datasets, focusing on the role’s resilience against automation.
Med
Long-term employer demand
Predicts the health of the job market for this role through 2034. Using Bureau of Labor Statistics data, it balances projected annual job openings (60%) with overall employment growth (40%).
Low
Sustained economic opportunity
Measures future earning potential and career flexibility. This score is a blend of total projected labor income (67%) and the role’s inherent ability to adapt to economic and technological shifts (33%).
Med
This reflects the reliability of your score based on the number of data sources available for this career and how closely those sources agree on the outlook. A higher confidence means more consistent evidence from labor experts and AI models.
Most data sources align, with only minor variation. This is a well-supported result.
AI Resilience Report forAdministrative Law Judges, Adjudicators, and Hearing Officers
$117,860 median salary•500 annual openings•SOC Code: 23-1021.00
Administrative Law Judges, Adjudicators, and Hearing Officers are somewhat less resilient to AI impacts than most occupations, according to our analysis of 8 sources.
This career is labeled "Somewhat Resilient" because AI is already changing some of the day-to-day work in meaningful ways, even while the most important parts of the job stay firmly in human hands. Tasks like legal research, document review, and scheduling are being automated or assisted by AI tools, which means the job is shifting rather than staying exactly the same.
Learn more about how you can thrive in this position
This role is somewhat resilient
This career is labeled "Somewhat Resilient" because AI is already changing some of the day-to-day work in meaningful ways, even while the most important parts of the job stay firmly in human hands. Tasks like legal research, document review, and scheduling are being automated or assisted by AI tools, which means the job is shifting rather than staying exactly the same.
Read full analysisAnalysis of current AI resilience
Admin Law Judges/Officers
Updated quarterly
How can Admin Law Judges/Officers prepare for AI?
Your Career Starts Here
Navigate your career with COACH, your free AI Career Coach. Research-backed, designed with career experts.
Latest AI news for Admin Law Judges/Officers
These articles offer valuable insights for future Administrative Law Judges, Adjudicators, and Hearing Officers regarding the evolving role of AI in their field. They highlight that while AI will automate certain tasks, such as document review and case triage, it is unlikely to replace the essential human elements of adjudication. For instance, the BrooklynWorks article discusses how agencies are already using machine-learning tools to enhance decision-making. Embracing AI can lead to increased efficiency, allowing professionals to focus more on complex legal issues and human interactions, fostering a resilient career path in a tech-driven landscape.
Will AI replace Administrative Law Judges, Adjudicators, and ...
canaireplacemyjob.com • 9/20/2026
Aug 20, 2026 — Explore the 48% modeled AI task exposure for Administrative Law Judges, Adjudicators, and Hearing Officers, the 2–4 years impact window, tasks
AI in Adjudication And Administration - BrooklynWorks
brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu • 9/20/2026
by C Coglianese · 2021 · Cited by 176 — Administrative agencies have proven much more willing than courts to use machine-learning algorithms, deploying such algorithmic tools to help in the delivery ... Read more
Will AI Replace Judges in 2026?
aicareerindex.com • 9/20/2026
AI tools accelerate routine research, document-review, and routine administrative work. The judicial work itself, the courtroom-and-bench presence, the legal- ... Read more
The Social Security Administration and AI Governance
dho.stanford.edu • 9/20/2026
by K Glaze · Cited by 27 — Insight has been fully deployed to adjudicative staff at the appeals level since late 2017 and the hearings level since late 2018. Internal ... Read more
Will AI replace hearing officers?
www.careerexplorer.com • 9/20/2026
Sep 5, 2026 — AI won't replace hearing officers, but it's already replacing some of the paperwork they do. Administrative agencies now use AI to triage cases, ... Read more
More Career Info
Career: Administrative Law Judges, Adjudicators, and Hearing Officers
They make decisions on legal cases by listening to both sides, reviewing evidence, and ensuring that rules and laws are followed.
Parent Careers
Employment & Wage Data
Median Wage
$117,860
Jobs (2025)
17,400
Growth (2025-35)
+0.0%
Annual Openings
500
Education
Doctoral or professional degree
Experience
5 years or more
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Employment Projections 2025-2035
Task-Level AI Resilience Scores
AI-generated estimates of task resilience over the next 3 years
1
Conduct hearings to review and decide claims regarding issues, such as social program eligibility, environmental protection, or enforcement of health and safety regulations.
2
Monitor and direct the activities of trials and hearings to ensure that they are conducted fairly and that courts administer justice while safeguarding the legal rights of all involved parties.
3
Rule on exceptions, motions, and admissibility of evidence.
4
Determine existence and amount of liability according to current laws, administrative and judicial precedents, and available evidence.
5
Prepare written opinions and decisions.
6
Confer with individuals or organizations involved in cases to obtain relevant information.
7
Recommend the acceptance or rejection of claims or compromise settlements according to laws, regulations, policies, and precedent decisions.
Tasks are ranked by their AI resilience, with the most resilient tasks shown first. Core tasks are essential functions of this occupation, while supplemental tasks provide additional context.
