Somewhat Resilient
Last Update: 6/19/2026
AI Resilience Score for Admin Law Judges/Officers:
37.9%
Median Score
Meaningful human contribution
Measures the parts of the occupation that still require a human touch. This score averages data from up to four AI exposure datasets, focusing on the role’s resilience against automation.
Med
Long-term employer demand
Predicts the health of the job market for this role through 2034. Using Bureau of Labor Statistics data, it balances projected annual job openings (60%) with overall employment growth (40%).
Low
Sustained economic opportunity
Measures future earning potential and career flexibility. This score is a blend of total projected labor income (67%) and the role’s inherent ability to adapt to economic and technological shifts (33%).
Med
This reflects the reliability of your score based on the number of data sources available for this career and how closely those sources agree on the outlook. A higher confidence means more consistent evidence from labor experts and AI models.
Most data sources align, with only minor variation. This is a well-supported result.
Contributing sources
AI Resilience Report forAdministrative Law Judges, Adjudicators, and Hearing Officers
$115,230 median salary•500 annual openings•SOC Code: 23-1021.00
Administrative Law Judges, Adjudicators, and Hearing Officers are somewhat less resilient to AI impacts than most occupations, according to our analysis of 7 sources.
This career is labeled "Somewhat Resilient" because AI is genuinely changing the day-to-day workflows of administrative law judges and hearing officers, even if it is not replacing them. AI tools are now handling a growing share of the preparatory and administrative work, like summarizing long documents, organizing case files, and conducting legal research, which means the job is shifting rather than disappearing.
Learn more about how you can thrive in this position
View analysis
Chat with Coach
Latest news
More career infoAnalysisChatNewsMoreThis role is somewhat resilient
This career is labeled "Somewhat Resilient" because AI is genuinely changing the day-to-day workflows of administrative law judges and hearing officers, even if it is not replacing them. AI tools are now handling a growing share of the preparatory and administrative work, like summarizing long documents, organizing case files, and conducting legal research, which means the job is shifting rather than disappearing.
Read full analysisLearn more about how you can thrive in this position
View analysisChat with CoachLatest newsMore career infoAnalysisChatNewsMoreAnalysis of Current AI Resilience
Admin Law Judges/Officers
Updated Quarterly
How is AI changing Admin Law Judges/Officers jobs?
Right now, AI is mostly augmenting the work of administrative law judges and hearing officers — not replacing them. A recent random-sample survey reported that more than 60% of responding federal judges have used at least one AI tool in their judicial work, while only 22.4% use AI tools on a weekly or daily basis, and they mostly use it for conducting legal research (30%) and reviewing documents (15.5%). Interview research from West Virginia University found judges turning to the technology to summarize lengthy documents, organize case materials, draft speeches and prepare questions ahead of oral arguments, treating it like a junior assistant — helpful for administrative or preparatory tasks, but not a substitute for legal reasoning or final judgment.
At federal agencies, the Social Security Administration is launching a Policy Assistant Tool (PAT), an AI-powered chatbot designed to give employees access to information more quickly [1], while the Department of Labor's AI Literacy Framework [2] supports workforce adjudicators in using AI responsibly.
Sources
How fast is AI adoption growing for Admin Law Judges/Officers?
Adoption is moving forward but cautiously. The American Bar Association's April 2026 update notes that over 60 percent of responding judges use at least one AI tool in their chambers, mostly for legal research and document review [3], and federal agencies are following the Administrative Conference of the United States' new statement of principles for administrative adjudication [4]. Tools are cheap and commercially available (ChatGPT, Westlaw AI, Lexis+ AI, CoCounsel), and agencies face huge case backlogs, which makes the economics attractive.
But several brakes slow things down: "hallucinations," or instances in which AI generates false or misleading information are a top concern, as are privacy, cybersecurity, and public trust — judges worry that even a single error like that could affect confidence in the courts. At an IAPP Global Summit panel, federal judges emphasized that the speed of technological advancement is outpacing society's ability to effectively regulate it [5]. The good news for young people eyeing this career: due process requires a human decision-maker, so the judgment, empathy, and ethical reasoning you bring will remain core to the job — AI will mostly handle the paperwork around it.
Sources
Will AI replace Admin Law Judges/Officers?
Not entirely. We think AI will take over some tasks, but not the whole job.
Our 37.9% AI Resilience Score reflects real pressure on this career. AI is already handling the preparatory work: legal research, document summarization, organizing case materials, and drafting prep questions. More than 60% of responding federal judges already use at least one AI tool in their work, mostly for research and document review [3]. Federal agencies are moving in the same direction, with tools like the Social Security Administration's Policy Assistant chatbot and the Department of Labor's AI Literacy Framework guiding responsible adoption (federalnewsnetwork.com, dol.gov).
What AI cannot do is make the final call. Due process requires a human decision-maker, and the judgment, empathy, and ethical reasoning at the core of this role are not going away. Concerns about AI "hallucinations" generating false information, plus privacy and public trust issues, are keeping adoption cautious [5]. The Administrative Conference of the United States has issued principles to keep humans accountable in adjudication [4].
The honest part: job market demand for this role is weak through 2034, so competition for positions will be real. But if you enter this field, expect to work alongside AI tools, not be replaced by them.
Sources
Help us improve this report.
Tell us if this analysis feels accurate or we missed something.
Share your feedback
Latest AI news for Admin Law Judges/Officers
These articles provide valuable insights for future Administrative Law Judges, Adjudicators, and Hearing Officers, highlighting how AI can enhance their roles rather than replace them. For instance, the Stanford article discusses how the Social Security Administration's early investments in AI infrastructure improved adjudication processes, suggesting that embracing technology can lead to more efficient decision-making. Similarly, the piece on AI tools for judges emphasizes how case management software can streamline scheduling and increase productivity, empowering judges to focus on more complex legal issues. Engaging with these developments can foster resilience in a changing legal landscape.
Artificial Intelligence for Adjudication: The Social Security ...
logic.stanford.edu • 6/20/2026
by K Glaze · Cited by 24 — We first discuss how early strategic investments by the SSA in data infrastructure, policy, and personnel laid the groundwork for AI. Read more
5 Best AI for Administrative Law Judges Tools
sonix.ai • 6/20/2026
Apr 23, 2026 — Streamline hearing management with these administrative judge AI tools. Compare case management, scheduling, and efficiency tools.
Advisory Committee on AI and the Courts Annual Report ...
www.nycourts.gov • 6/20/2026
Dec 29, 2025 — 1 The Advisory Committee has been tasked with examining the use of AI technology by judges, non-judicial staff, attorneys, and litigants in the ... Read more
Will AI Replace Administrative Law Judges in 2026?
aicareerindex.com • 6/20/2026
AI is already replacing significant portions of routine legal work in this role: research, document review, standard drafting, and contract analysis. The career ... Read more
AI in Courtrooms : The Future of Judging | Zahir Williams
www.linkedin.com • 6/20/2026
AI as a judicial assistant is not about replacing judges but about enhancing their ability to deliver well informed, data-driven decisions. The ... Read more
More Career Info
Career: Administrative Law Judges, Adjudicators, and Hearing Officers
They make decisions on legal cases by listening to both sides, reviewing evidence, and ensuring that rules and laws are followed.
Parent Careers
Employment & Wage Data
Median Wage
$115,230
Jobs (2024)
17,500
Growth (2024-34)
-0.7%
Annual Openings
500
Education
Doctoral or professional degree
Experience
5 years or more
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Employment Projections 2024-2034
Task-Level AI Resilience Scores
AI-generated estimates of task resilience over the next 3 years
1
Rule on exceptions, motions, and admissibility of evidence.
2
Conduct hearings to review and decide claims regarding issues such as social program eligibility, environmental protection, and enforcement of health and safety regulations.
3
Determine existence and amount of liability according to current laws, administrative and judicial precedents, and available evidence.
4
Recommend the acceptance or rejection of claims or compromise settlements according to laws, regulations, policies, and precedent decisions.
5
Prepare written opinions and decisions.
6
Issue subpoenas and administer oaths in preparation for formal hearings.
7
Confer with individuals or organizations involved in cases to obtain relevant information.
Tasks are ranked by their AI resilience, with the most resilient tasks shown first. Core tasks are essential functions of this occupation, while supplemental tasks provide additional context.
