Resilient
Last Update: 5/19/2026
AI Resilience Score for Phlebotomists:
67.8%
Median Score
Meaningful human contribution
Measures the parts of the occupation that still require a human touch. This score averages data from up to four AI exposure datasets, focusing on the role’s resilience against automation.
High
Long-term employer demand
Predicts the health of the job market for this role through 2034. Using Bureau of Labor Statistics data, it balances projected annual job openings (60%) with overall employment growth (40%).
High
Sustained economic opportunity
Measures future earning potential and career flexibility. This score is a blend of total projected labor income (67%) and the role’s inherent ability to adapt to economic and technological shifts (33%).
Med
This reflects the reliability of your score based on the number of data sources available for this career and how closely those sources agree on the outlook. A higher confidence means more consistent evidence from labor experts and AI models.
Most data sources align, with only minor variation. This is a well-supported result.
Contributing sources
AI Resilience Report forPhlebotomists
$43,660 median salary•18,400 annual openings•SOC Code: 31-9097.00
Phlebotomists are more resilient to AI impacts than most occupations, according to our analysis of 6 sources.
Phlebotomy is labeled **Resilient** because the heart of the job — calming anxious patients, building trust, and handling tricky draws on kids or elderly people — relies on human connection and physical skill that robots still can't replicate well. While AI-powered robotic devices like Aletta are starting to automate routine blood draws in some settings, adoption is still slow due to high costs, regulatory hurdles, and concerns about bias and accuracy.
Learn more about how you can thrive in this position
Learn more about how you can thrive in this position
This role is resilient
Phlebotomy is labeled **Resilient** because the heart of the job — calming anxious patients, building trust, and handling tricky draws on kids or elderly people — relies on human connection and physical skill that robots still can't replicate well. While AI-powered robotic devices like Aletta are starting to automate routine blood draws in some settings, adoption is still slow due to high costs, regulatory hurdles, and concerns about bias and accuracy.
Read full analysisAnalysis of Current AI Resilience
Phlebotomists
Updated Quarterly

How is AI changing Phlebotomists jobs?
The biggest AI story in phlebotomy right now is the rise of robotic blood-draw machines. A device called Aletta, made by Vitestro, uses AI-guided Doppler ultrasound to find a vein and insert the needle by itself — the robotic arm has a Doppler ultrasound probe that uses AI to figure out where the needle goes in, and the blood is collected in tubes before Aletta applies a bandage. In a recent multicenter trial, the automated system had a 94.5% first-stick success rate when a suitable vein was identified, and 90% of patients reported less, similar, or far less pain compared to manual phlebotomy.
AI is also helping with the lab side of the job, like sorting samples and matching them to orders. Still, only a small slice of labs use AI today — only 17.4 percent of respondents reported having incorporated AI tools in their laboratories, so most blood draws and specimen prep are still done by people.

How fast is AI adoption growing for Phlebotomists?
Adoption is moving, but slowly. A huge push factor is the worker shortage: Northwestern Medicine will participate in a multicenter clinical trial validating Vitestro's Aletta, with the goal of addressing critical phlebotomy workforce shortages, improving sample quality, and enhancing patient throughput. The job market still looks healthy too — the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics projects phlebotomist employment to grow 6% from 2024 to 2034, faster than the average occupation, with about 18,400 openings each year [1].
Slowing things down are cost, regulation, and trust. Many laboratories are hesitant to incorporate AI because implementation requires evaluating cost-effectiveness against scalability, biased algorithms could produce incorrect results for minority populations, and there is a lack of regulations creating liability and security concerns. The good news for young people: the human side of the job — calming nervous patients, handling tricky veins on kids or elderly people, and earning patient trust — is exactly what robots still can't do well.
If you train as a phlebotomist, you'll likely work alongside these tools, not be replaced by them.
Sources

Help us improve this report.
Tell us if this analysis feels accurate or we missed something.
Share your feedback
Your Career Starts Here
Navigate your career with COACH, your free AI Career Coach. Research-backed, designed with career experts.
More Career Info
Career: Phlebotomists
They draw blood from patients for tests, donations, or research, helping doctors diagnose and treat health issues.
Parent Careers
Similar Careers
Employment & Wage Data
Median Wage
$43,660
Jobs (2024)
139,700
Growth (2024-34)
+5.6%
Annual Openings
18,400
Education
Postsecondary nondegree award
Experience
None
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Employment Projections 2024-2034
Task-Level AI Resilience Scores
AI-generated estimates of task resilience over the next 3 years
1
Collect fluid or tissue samples, using appropriate collection procedures.
2
Administer subcutaneous or intramuscular injects, in accordance with licensing restrictions.
3
Calibrate or maintain machines, such as those used for plasma collection.
4
Serve refreshments to donors to ensure absorption of sugar into their systems.
5
Draw blood from capillaries by dermal puncture, such as heel or finger stick methods.
6
Draw blood from veins by vacuum tube, syringe, or butterfly venipuncture methods.
7
Dispose of contaminated sharps, in accordance with applicable laws, standards, and policies.
Tasks are ranked by their AI resilience, with the most resilient tasks shown first. Core tasks are essential functions of this occupation, while supplemental tasks provide additional context.
