Explosives Workers, Ordnance Handling Experts, and Blasters

Some drilling-and-blast jobs already use technology to help workers. For example, mining companies use computer software and AI to plan where to drill blast holes. Tools like Orica’s BastIQ or ABB’s Robot Charger use sensors and cameras to match holes to a blast plan and even load explosives without a person right there ^{[1] [2]}.

These systems can place and charge explosives in holes automatically, which keeps workers out of danger. In one project, a fully sealed, robot-operated tunnel face let machines do every drill-and-blast step while humans stayed safely away ^{[2] [1]}. In contrast, many safety tasks are still done by people.

For example, machines don’t really put out warning cones or use radios on their own – crews still handle these jobs. Experts note that remote robots “have a definite compromise on precision” compared to a trained human spotting problems up close ^{[3] [2]}. In short, today technology is helping with the most dangerous parts of blasting, but humans still handle many decisions and fine work.

Automation in blasting grows because it can boost safety and productivity, but new systems also cost a lot. Studies show robots can let a mine do two or three blasting cycles per shift instead of just one ^[2] – a big efficiency gain. Leaving people out of the blast zone also cuts risks and downtime.

However, smart charging robots and sensors are expensive and need skilled workers to run them. As one contractor explained, initial robot costs are high, but over time “the long-term return on investment and impact on health and safety” often outweigh the price ^{[3] [2]}. Researchers also point out that companies must train crews to use new tools; even the best tech needs human experts to set it up and watch it work ^{[4] [2]}.

For these reasons, experts expect gradual adoption: blasting firms will likely add AI and robots where the safety and efficiency pay off most, while still relying on skilled people for crucial checks and upkeep ^{[3] [2]}. In the end, automation in this field is about making dangerous work safer – but humans remain vital for judgment, maintenance, and teamwork ^{[3] [2]}.